Panasonic Lumix DHC-FH27 Review

17 Sep


DHC-FH27  Top-and-spring out cameras need to do three equipment well to be value your money: take excellent cinema, grant a pleasant, hassle-free user encounter, and place forward facial appearance that your cell phone’s camera doesn’t. The 16-megapixel, Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 ($229.95 supervise over) comes with bounty of best-than-phone facial appearance, like 8x optical zoom and enhanced image stabilization, but its images are soft, and it’s more hard to use than necessary thankfulness to a convoluted upset-based user boundary. If you need a upset cover, pay the superfluous $70 and get the Canon PowerShot Elph 500 HS ($299, 4 stars). Best yet, ditch the upset cover, and get a much best camera for the same price in the Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS ($229.99, 4 stars).

A very nice package that comes in black, silver, or red, the FH27 is excellent-looking, set alight, and comfortable to hold. Measuring 2.2 by 3.9 by 1.1 inches (HWD) and weighing 5.4 ounces, it’s certainly pocketable. On the front of the camera are the lens, the sparkle, and a tiny, hard bar that acts as a grip. On top are a slider-style power batter, the shutter release, a traditional zoom trigger, and a clever pin called E. Zoom, which zooms all the way in or out with a release push. The USB port is on the left side of the camera, and the array and SD card slots hide bottom a sliding door on the underside.



The lens’ crucial length extends from 28-224mm (35mm corresponding), which adds up to 8x optical zoom, and the corresponding gap is f/3.3-f/5.9. That’s more zoom than most pocket cameras, which tend to top out at 4 or 5x. The less-high-priced Sony Cyber-shot W350 ($199, 3.5 stars), even if, matches the FH27 with 8x zoom.

The joystick are restricted because the LCD on the back of the FH27 is the hallmark of this camera. Sorry to say, that’s not a excellent business. The 3-inch, 230K-dot spectacle is a clad size, but it may possibly be larger; there’s a honest amount of unused black interval on the back of the camera. The LCD is quite bright, which means it’ll be simple to use out-of-doors, but draw a distinction is lacking. Dark colors don’t look dark enough, and set alight ones look too set alight, which predestined that my test images looked of poorer quality on the camera than they really were.

DHC-FH27 Specifications

16 MP
Media Plot
Reliable Digital Extended Room
35-mm Corresponding (Wide)
35-mm Corresponding (Telephoto)
Optical Zoom
8 x
LCD size
3 inches
Record Resolution


Even with all that, the upset-cover boundary is what really hinders this camera. In view of the fact that everything you do additional than zoom and spring out is controlled via the LCD, you’d reflect the boundary would be austere, with generous on-cover buttons and simple-to-door menus. Instead, the FH27 packs a load of mysterious icons, lacking a lot of explanation, and forces you to go through a digit of uncommon menus to door some very basic functions. The Canon Elph 500 HS, on the additional hand, is an example of a well-executed upset encounter: Icons are huge and austere, and everything you need to do is only a upset or two away. The Nikon Coolpix S4000 ($179.95, 3 stars) combines a upset cover with buttons, so you don’t have to rely on upset as much—I preferred that method.

Everything the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 does, it does promptly. It takes just 2 seconds to turn on and capture an image, and you only wait an average of 2.3 seconds between shots. Both scores are very quick for a compact camera, as is the FH27′s 0.4 second of lag between shutter push and image capture. The Nikon S4000 plodded by comparison, with .65 seconds of shutter lag, 3.2 seconds to boot and spring out, and 2.5 seconds of recycle time.

To set up serration, Imatest events 50 spots throughout an image and comes up with a lines-per-depiction-height notch, where more is best. Images from the FH27 were underwhelming, scoring a center-weighted average of just 1,548 lines per depiction height. Most cameras we’ve tested just beat that notch: even the $89.99 Canon PowerShot A800 (3 stars) whipped this camera with an impressive 2,176 lines per depiction height. A notch of 1,800 or privileged is excellent; the FH27′s poor screening means you’ll end up with soft images even in essential lighting.

When it comes to low-set alight performance, the FH27 performed best. In low-set alight shooting situations, you need to bring to somebody’s attention your camera’s ISO sensitivity to let in more set alight, a administer that tends to introduces noise into your images. If Imatest detects more than 1.5 percent noise surrounded by an image, the image is likely loud to the top of being unusable. The Panasonic FH27 was able to spring out up to and counting ISO 1600 lacking breaking the 1.5 percent noise threshold, which means it will perform nicely in low set alight. (But again, persons images won’t be as astute as they should be.) The Canon PowerShot Elph 500 HS couldn’t contest that, going up to just ISO 800 before hitting the 1.5-percent mark.

There is but one choice for shooting HD record with the FH27, and it’s not an essential one—720p at 24 frames per second. Record recorded by the camera was of clad feature, with excellent colors and astute footage, but shooting at 24 frames per second just didn’t seem like enough. To get best quick-action record, you’ll need to spring out in 640-by-480 ordinary definition, which has its own issues.

The FH27 captures photos and record to SDXC, SDHC, and SD cards, and the camera uses a proprietary USB cable (which is built-in) to connect to your notebook. As always, universal mini-USB is a best choice. There’s no HDMI port for playing back your photos and videos on an HDTV, which is an unfortunate omission.

On paper, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH27 looks like like a fantastic camera: It’s got a huge LCD, a upset cover, 8x optical zoom, and a slim body all for less than $250. But it’s intricate and frustrating to use, and doesn’t grant excellent enough photos to make it value the hassle. If you want a upset-cover camera that’s simple to use and performs well, the Canon PowerShot Elph 500 HS is a much best pick. Even as it’s far from exact, the Nikon Coolpix S4000 is also a excellent fiscal statement upset-cover nominee.



Related Technology Reviews

Leave a comment

Posted by on September 17, 2011 in Uncategorized


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: